12/1/2023 0 Comments Chicago lockdown 2020![]() Our preliminary research suggests that the experience of COVID-19 should at least give authorities pause before introducing lockdowns as a blanket strategy. For higher-income households, the stay-at-home order brought some inconvenience, but many also enjoyed the benefit of working from home - a trend that continued even after the city lifted all restrictions in 2022. The stay-at-home order had a devastating impact on the economy (especially the service sector) and on Black and Latino neighbourhoods, where many residents who worked in essential services lived. Pritzker announced a shelter-in-place order to combat the spread of COVID-19 on March 20, 2020. It closed restaurants, offices and public schools, but many resource-rich private schools remained open and offered in-person instruction.Ĭhicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot speaks after Illinois Gov. ![]() The city issued a stay-at-home order from March 20 to April 30, 2020, but exempted many essential activities, including exercising outdoors and shopping for groceries. These restrictions contributed to the so-called “freedom convoy,” which occupied parts of Ottawa in protest in 2022.Īnti-vax protest or insurrection? Making sense of the 'freedom convoy' protestĬomparatively, Chicago had a soft lockdown. ![]() Racialized and lower-income people experienced the lockdown measures as an additional, often existential, burden, while residents in higher-income households experienced temporary inconvenience.Įventually, restrictive measures were enacted across all three levels of government. There was a visible class divide in Canada’s urban communities. There were significant differences between rich and poor, office and essential workers, households saddled with caregiving responsibilities and those without.Ĭommunity responses varied across the region as the impact of the pandemic intensified in health and economic terms. The lockdown had uneven impacts across Toronto. This gave the city a reputation of imposing lockdowns that were longer and stricter than most. Throughout subsequent waves of surges, Toronto oscillated between opening up and shutting down. Subject mostly to provincial oversight in public health management, the city closed schools and restaurants, cancelled professional sporting events and restricted most public life, leaving intact only emergency and essential services. Toronto’s early response to COVID-19 was swift and decisive, but not as restrictive as in Johannesburg. Lockdown didn't work in South Africa: why it shouldn't happen again Children in poor communities lost more than a year of schooling, while those from affluent communities moved online. There was a shadow pandemic of violence against women, with South African police reporting a 37 per cent increase in gender-based crime. Social disparity in South Africa, one of the world’s most unequal societies, increased throughout the pandemic. There was a difference between how the lockdown was experienced by, for example, households in informal settlements and middle-class households in the suburbs. This was especially so for those who did not have the option of home-based work. The lockdown may have delayed the first wave by a month or so, but its economic impact was more traumatic than the impact of the illness. Soldiers patrol the streets of Soweto, a township in Johannesburg, during a lockdown instated to combat the spread of the coronavirus. The response remained national in scope, with the National Coronavirus Command Council issuing directives to the provincial governments, which manage health care, and local governments, which provide services in distressed communities. On May 1, 2020, South Africa introduced a five-level risk-adjusted strategy. The lockdown had a devastating impact on the economy, people’s livelihoods and food security. It was a blunt instrument applied uniformly across the country, although patterns of infection varied widely by region and locality. Strictly enforced by the announcement of a National State of Disaster, which gave government extraordinary powers, it banned all outdoor activities except for essential services. South Africa’s hard lockdown in 2020 - lasting from March 27 to April 30 - was modelled on Wuhan’s. Lockdown meant different things in different places, but regardless of the context, they disproportionately afflicted those who are and the disadvantaged. We found “lockdown” to be an imprecise description for the range of restrictions put in place. We examined the nature and impact of public health measures on various populations in these cities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |